Tuesday, May 02, 2006
The Rules of Engagement
Senior Status:
Armen's ProfileTacitus' Profile
Tom's Profile
Disco Stu(d)'s Profile
Mad J.D.'s Profile
Max Power Profile
Isaac's Profile
Earl Warren's Profile
MRP's Profile
Sean Fernandes' Profile
Slam Master A's Profile
TJ's Profile
Caley's Profile
Carbolic's Profile
McWho's Profile
Patrick's Profile
Toney's Profile
J.D.elicious' Profile
Bekki's Profile
Dan's Profile
Petch’s Profile
Active Status:
Jackie O's ProfileJames' Profile
L'Alex's Profile
Maude's Profile
McTwo’s Profile
Ursus Major's Profile
Labeled Threads:
What is a Labeled Thread?0L/1L Advice
Academia
Bar Exams
BLF
Boalt Briefs
Classes and Professors
CLR Discussion
Clerkships
DE
Deep Space
DO
Elections
Exams
Grades
Grammar Snarks
Greetings from the BHSA
Honor Code
Idaho
Kashmiri
Law Student Life
Legal Culture
Legal Education Costs
Library
LRAP
Moot Court and Trial Team
Moving Out (Graduation)
N&B
Nancy Grace
OCIP and Employment
Only in Berkeley
Professor Quotes
Professor Ratings
Prop. 8
Rabid Conservatives
Rabid Liberals
Rankings
Shiny Gold Stars
Technology Rants
The Others
The Red Menace
The Resident Evil
The Simpsons
Yoo-Hoo
Blogroll
De NovoThe Tacitus Project
Group Think Tank
Berkeley/Boalt Blogs
Anderson BerryBeetle Beat
Berkeley Graduate
Berkeley Jurisprude
Berkeley Law Blog
Bleed Blue & Gold
Boalt Professor Review
Boalt H. Civ. P.
Boalt Movie Review
Cal Stuff
Cause and Defect
Dean Berring's Building Blog
Exact Approx
Expressio Unius
For God and For Cheese
Frolicking in Your Panda
A Girl Walks into a Bar (Exam)
Governing Through Crime
Jungle Cat Diaries
I'm Not Crunchy
La Mitotera
Musings from Boalt Hall
Robert Reich's Blog
The Present Tense
Repatriated Expatriate
The Seema Machine
Stacita
A Year Deferred
Other Blogs
Above the LawAmbivalent Imbroglio
Amicus Curae
The Armacost Project
Bag and Baggage (Boalt '90)
Bainbridge
Balkinization
Barely Legal
Begging to Differ
Biting Tongue
Black Book Legal
Blawg Wisdom
BlueGrassRoots
Boffo Blog
Buffalo Wings & Vodka
Color of Law
Concurring Opinions
The Debate Link
Dropping a Barbell
EB Express Blog
First Movers
The Frugal Law Student
Half the Sins of Mankind
Head Heeb
Hear Me Roar
Illiterally
Intel Dump
Inter Alia
Is That Legal?
JAG Central
JD2B
Jeremy Blachman
Kevin Drum
Law & Terrorism Blog
Law Career Blog
Legal Ethics
Legal Times Blog
Leiter's Law School Rep
Leiter Rep
Life of Lexi (UVA/Hutz fan)
Mel Woods
Memoirs of Hastings
Notes from the (1L) Underground
Notes from the (Legal) Underground
Objective Justice
Orin Kerr
Other Side of Wall (Hastings)
Prague Blog
Random...Chase
Samples Connection
SCOTUSBlog
The Berkeley Blog
The Shark
SoapBox Law
Sua Sponte
Sua Sponte (GW Law)
Sui Generis
Three Years of Hell
TJ's Double Play
Trad'l Notions (USF)
Turning Cathy into a Lawyer
Underneath Their Robes
Volokh Conspiracy
Will Work for Favorable Dicta
11 Comments:
I think "hot chic on webcam" was better.
link it
Just go to the Colbert link and it's there as the #2 video.
wow, you're right. when you scroll down, it seems that the colbert piece is out of place. armen, you dog you, out of all the countless sites that hosted this video, was it a coincidence you chose this one?
I make no claims or representations regarding the site hosting the Colbert video. However, I am eternally grateful to ever-so-vigilant readers of Nuts and Boalts. Although given that this involves a swanky video on the internet, I have a hunch as to who 3:50 is.
If that was a reference to the simpsons, Armen [Tanzarian], then I believe "'swank'-y" is the term you're looking for. Unless, of course, you thought the video was "imposingly fashionable and elegant."
I really needed to get that off my chest.
If you want to eat at a swank restaurant that's your choice. I'll stick to Krusty Burgers.
Did any of you read the NY times article (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/03/arts/03colb.html?hp&ex=1146715200&en=ca5165dd06591dfd&ei=5094&partner=homepage [sorry, don't know html code]) on the Colbert speech?
I totally disagree with my friend Noam Scheiber, who said "I laughed out loud maybe twice during Colbert's entire 20-odd minute routine. Colbert's problem, blogosphere conspiracy theories notwithstanding, is that he just wasn't very entertaining."
I disagree, though of course it depends on how you define "entertaining." Granted, I didn't laugh a ton at his speech, but it was largely because the irony cut too close to home...but it was well done and held my interest. In my book, that's interesting.
Noam's just still sore he lost out on the TNR top job to Frankie Foer (Jeff).
I thought Colbert was hilarious -- all the more so because official Washington had their napkins jammed too far up their asses to laugh. I've been to one of these, many moons ago. You glue a smile on your face and freeze your blood for three hours. Given a choice between playing to the hall and playing to the 45 million of us who voted for John Kerry, I think Colbert made the right call. I'm only sorry he didn't work the phrase, "Stop, you're hurting America" into the roast, or the circle of irony would have been complete.
What are the blogosphere conspiracy theories about Colbert?
I thought it was pretty funny for the most part although the video was pretty lame.
I'm not a Washington insider but it was indeed terrible comedy. Colbert is hilarious, and needs to do the Colbert Report forever, but this was bad comedy. Seriously, the joke about someone pulling themselves up by their bootstraps because he saw someone do it in cirque du soleil, or the 90 minute long video of Helen Thomas chasing him?
You folks have blocked the vast majority of the routine out because of one or two (admittedly very good) swipes at Bush and Cheney. Fine, he spoke truth to power, for like a minute. But the rest was dull and made me cringe in a "I'm so embarrassed for you," way, not an "I wish you weren't slamming the media, or which I'm a member" way.
Post a Comment
<< Home