Monday, June 11, 2007

The Missing Bang

So David Chase is a big fan of the Choose Your Own Adventure series. I can see that. The final 10 seconds of the Sopranos—the ominous dime-store hit-man who heads for what has to be an old-fashioned kind of toilet, the cut-aways to people walking in the door, the furtive glances of Tony, the tortured lateness of Meadow, the dramatic cut to 5 seconds of all black before the credits silently roll—is Chase asking, if not begging, the viewer to fill in the rest. Something happened in those five seconds but Chase isn’t going to tell us. That’s going to leave a lot of people angry. But come on, this is a Boalt blog. We know how to plug in answers.

(I’ll have some more thoughts on the episode tomorrow, but for now I thought I’d focus on the ending.)

For me--like a certain cowboy President--I’m tempted to declare victory and go home. I called Meadow’s death last week and I stand by it. That’s how I see the last scene, with the ridiculously heightened tension as we cut again and again to Meadow mis-parking the car. The cinematography draws out the agony and zeroes in on her obviously bad timing (wasn’t it a kind of bad timing that led to her pregnancy, after all?). And then the final sequence—Meadow running into the restaurant, running too quickly, and Tony looks up at her and then—blank. Bad timing into the crossfire. Meadow knew too much--but not about the mob, of course, but how to get out. (“I see how the state can crush the individual,” Meadow says. “New Jersey?!” Tony asks.) That’s how every post-9/11 libertarian mafia epiphany ends up, right?

There’s another plausible ending that I just read about that’s growing on me. Quite simply, Tony’s been shot in the head. Remember the last scene from last week? Tony has a brief flashback to being on the boat with Bobby, and Bobby says, “In the end, you never hear it coming.” If the Sopranos is about how Tony sees the world—and the therapy sessions are as close to first-person narration as you can get—then sudden silence and blackness is what follows being killed. The screen goes dark suddenly because so has Tony. This also would help explain the look of shock on Meadow’s face as she walks into the diner. In the end, Tony never heard it coming—and neither do we.

Now I like that. But that shit ain’t the truth. The truth is—as my original Sopranos-watching confederate explained it—is that there are no final five seconds. It’s a meta-ending. The point isn’t that something happened, but that something always can and will. That feeling of dread and uneasy expectation is what Tony has been left with—endless agita. Under fire from family and Family and Feds. But that’s where we’ve been headed all along. For 86 episodes, Chase has confronted us with ambiguity and anxiousness, daring us to sympathize with Tony or take his side. But the “right” reaction from the viewer has never been clear; there’s too much pathos in Tony’s saga to take sides. The moral complexity is the point of the show—declared to comic effect by Agent Harris who, when he finds out Phil Leotrado has been capped, pounds his desk and says, “Damn, we’re going to win this thing!”—a joke on the viewer as much as it is on the FBI. We’re supposed to be confused about whose side we’re on. The point of the last shot is to not relieve us of that ambiguity.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

EW: when was Meadow pregnant?

6/11/2007 8:59 AM  
Blogger Earl Warren said...

I think Meadow's pregnancy was hinted pretty strongly with the rushed engagement, the fact that she's coming from the ob-gyn office (and late and rushed), and the reference to kids when she's having dinner with Dad.

For what it's worth, the Tony-is-dead theory has become pretty compelling to me. In addition to the obvious sudden black screen and silence which goes for 11 seconds (which is no way to signal a "life goes on" kind of cheeky moment), consider 1) the Bobby flashback from last episode ("you never hear it coming") 2) Tony eating an orange earlier in the episode at Carmela's spec house (big Godfather death symbol) 3) the unbroken pattern of the last scene: bell rings, camera centers on Tony, then the view shifts to Tony's perspective on the door -- happened three times before the final seconds (stranger, Carmela, then AJ and Members Only guy); on the fourth time, bells rings, shot of Tony -- and if the pattern holds, next shot is from Tony's perspective: all black 4) Meadow being the one to see it or just miss it fits with Chase's themes about her escaping, being on the outside, etc. 5) Agent Harris quoted in the NY Post today about how the original filming of the final scene suggested Tony's death a lot more obviously 6) David Chase quoted in the Newark Star-Ledger today about how he wasn't messing with people and there is a resolution 7) last word of the episode -- "stop" -- courtesy of Journey.

That adds up for me. Is that a tighter ending then showing Ton'y head slam into the mirror and cutting straight to the credits? No -- but its got people still talking.

I'm still mulling the cat though. My second-favorite theory: it proves Paulie is a rat (which is why he is so uncomfortable around it). Favorite theory: It's a reference to Schrodinger's Cat! That would be the famous physics thought experiment where, being unable to OBSERVE a phenomenon, both possible quantum phenomena (decayed or undecayed nuclei for physicists, decayed or undecayed Tony for us) exist simultaneously. The act of observation--were it possible--would force the system into one or the other states. Since in our case, observation is possible, we're left with both endings.

If someone can cite to the fact that Schrodinger had an orange cat in mind, I'll freaking flip out and admit Chase is a deity.

6/12/2007 11:18 PM  
Blogger Earl Warren said...

I meant 'impossible' in that last sentence. Also, as evidence of my close reading skills, I should say that not a single one of my theories or observations is original -- my reaction at the time being closer to "WTF?" than anything coherent.

6/12/2007 11:22 PM  
Blogger Disco Stu said...

Judging from all the comments earl, you and I may be the only ones who care. For my part, you've gotten everything, and I mean everything, wrong.

Let's go down your list. First, as for the Bobby flashback ("you never hear it coming"), Bobby heard it coming. He looked up from that blue comet train and saw the two thugs pull their guns from their jackets and open up on him. That he said "in the end, you never hear it coming," and that he plainly heard it coming shows his wisdom wasn't really that correct.

Second, as for Tony eating the orange, Soprano's writers have had attributed to them far more Godfather references than they intend (tends to happen when the subject matter is the same, and the Godfather has a good 9-10 hours of filming upon which to draw). To wit: your assertion, joined by many, that Meadow would die based on the background music playing when Tony and Carm explained away Meadow's move from medicine to law (and, by the way, that scene is among the funnier ever on the Soprano's. Tony says, in response to Carm's thought that they are thrilled Meadow is not going into medicine, "You know with AIDS, and uh. . . ." Brilliant.). In short, Godfather references drawn from the Soprano's = overplayed.

Third, okay, I'll give you this one. That's a good catch and something, having just watched the scene yet again, that's a very compelling argument. But, there's a flaw in your pattern. Right before AJ and Member's Only enter, and before the bell triggering the "Tony-eye view," the camera switches from it's usual shot to the Tony perspective. So, we can see that Tony sees the door open, bell go off, Member's Only enters followed closely by AJ. This is a departure from the normal, bell rings when we see Tony, then we switch to his perspective. So, although your argument is compelling, those scenes don't represent a pattern (although it comes very close).

Next, can't really argue with Meadow's distance from the family. Except that, the theme of the episode was her getting pulled back into the fold. She was the one person in that family that was never under any delusions about what Tony did or how they got their money. AJ was too young to understand. Carm tried for years to rationalize her lifestyle by doing good things. But Meadow, she was always aware it was blood money she was spending. That's why, in the last episode when she claims it was because of all those times Tony was dragged away by the FBI that she is going into law, it struck me that she was one of them again. She had decided to forgo medicine in California with Finn, and shack up close to home with a mobster's son, herself a mobster's daughter. So, while I would agree that Meadow had been on the outside, the last episode pulled her closer to the inside than she had been in a while.

I can't speak to Agent Harris's quote, as I never saw it. But I do want to say something about your assertion that Chase said there is a resolution. Chase said, "it's all there." He doesn't want to add anything or explain anything. That is hardly a ringing endorsement from the series creator that the end provides a resolution.

Lastly, as for the last word being "stop," it reminds me of an old joke. A reporter asks a Russian premier to describe the state of Russia's economy in one word. "Good" he replies. Another reporter asks him to describe the economy in two words. "Not good." Saying that "stop" is the last word is misleading. The last two words are "don't stop," which could easily be interpreted to mean just the opposite of "stop." Don't stop thinking about these characters. Don't stop thinking about the issues this show has raised. Don't stop watching HBO. Whatever.

As for schrodinger's cat, I don't get it. I never have. I took quantum mechanics and the experiment never made sense to me. I do know, however, that the essence of the experiment is that you are only able to observe something in one state. Therefore, the notion that because we observed the ending, more than one interpretation of that ending is impossible, is against the experiment's conclusion. I still don't get it.

And, that all these things can be reinterpreted is a tribute to Chase's brilliance. It's a very open ended scene, yielding multiple interpretations, all of which make sense.

For my part, I think there's more significance to Tony's last scene with Junior than has been talked about. Junior, along with Tony's father, ran North Jersey. Yet he's living a poor life, confined to a wheelchair and a state run half prison, half mental-ward. I think when Tony leaves there, in the back of his mind he's thinking it's better to die in your prime than to live out the last years of your life as junior is.

So, maybe Tony does die. Maybe we're supposed to be happy with that. Maybe, from my interpretation of the last scene with Junior, Tony would be happy with that. But, maybe is exactly my point. Everything is up in the open.

6/14/2007 9:23 PM  
Blogger Armen Adzhemyan said...

DS, that Russian premier joke had me laughing my ass off. It's almost as funny as the muffin joke. It's THAT funny.

6/14/2007 9:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home