In Defense of Cycling
I've been out of the loop for a while. When I talked to my mom last night, she informed me of the Tour de France news. I'm probably one of two Boalties who care. But, probably all have seen some portion of the news. Here's my take.
Michael Rasmussen wore the leader's yellow jersey and was kicked out of the tour this year while the race was going on.
Here are the facts, at least what I can gather of them. Rasmussen was supposed to be in Denmark having his blood tested by the Danish Cycling Federation in late-May and late-June. He claims he was in Mexico visiting his wife’s family, at least for the late-June part. A tour commentator stated, on-air I believe, that this tour commentator saw Rasmussen cycling in Italy in mid-June. This has not been proved. (Now, I hated evidence in law school and I certainly hated it on the bar, but I know that this commentator’s statement is hearsay not within any exception). Then the Danish cycling federation kicked Rasmussen off the Danish national team for failing to show up for these tests. His employer, Team Rabobank, decided to pull him out of the tour for these alleged lies as well, even though Rasmussen never missed one of their drug tests. Rasmussen has never tested positive for any drugs.
I don’t think Rasmussen should have been kicked out of the tour. Call me an old-fashioned innocent-until-proven-guilty kind of guy. But I’m willing to go along with his team's decision and I think it's probably best for the sport. For, as tour rider and American Christian Vande Velde said, “if his team doesn’t believe him anymore, then we shouldn’t either.”
What I really hate is American’s thinking Cycling is a corrupt sport because they hear riders are kicked out of competition all the time. Cycling has now adopted a guilty-until-proven-innocent system designed to cleanse the sport of dopers by taking a hard-line, an automatic two-year suspension from the sport. Americans think the sport is corrupt because of this hard line, and they bash cycling for it. Yet, American sports continue to turn their heads the other way and the public here thinks it’s the individuals and not the sports that are corrupt. In other words, baseball does nothing, so the public assumes it’s only the players like Bonds, Palmeiro, McGuire, Sosa, etc. that are to blame. Yet cycling kicks out anyone that doesn’t even report for a drug test, and everyone thinks the sport is corrupt. It doesn’t make sense and it’s really starting to piss me off.
That's my post-bar rant.
Michael Rasmussen wore the leader's yellow jersey and was kicked out of the tour this year while the race was going on.
Here are the facts, at least what I can gather of them. Rasmussen was supposed to be in Denmark having his blood tested by the Danish Cycling Federation in late-May and late-June. He claims he was in Mexico visiting his wife’s family, at least for the late-June part. A tour commentator stated, on-air I believe, that this tour commentator saw Rasmussen cycling in Italy in mid-June. This has not been proved. (Now, I hated evidence in law school and I certainly hated it on the bar, but I know that this commentator’s statement is hearsay not within any exception). Then the Danish cycling federation kicked Rasmussen off the Danish national team for failing to show up for these tests. His employer, Team Rabobank, decided to pull him out of the tour for these alleged lies as well, even though Rasmussen never missed one of their drug tests. Rasmussen has never tested positive for any drugs.
I don’t think Rasmussen should have been kicked out of the tour. Call me an old-fashioned innocent-until-proven-guilty kind of guy. But I’m willing to go along with his team's decision and I think it's probably best for the sport. For, as tour rider and American Christian Vande Velde said, “if his team doesn’t believe him anymore, then we shouldn’t either.”
What I really hate is American’s thinking Cycling is a corrupt sport because they hear riders are kicked out of competition all the time. Cycling has now adopted a guilty-until-proven-innocent system designed to cleanse the sport of dopers by taking a hard-line, an automatic two-year suspension from the sport. Americans think the sport is corrupt because of this hard line, and they bash cycling for it. Yet, American sports continue to turn their heads the other way and the public here thinks it’s the individuals and not the sports that are corrupt. In other words, baseball does nothing, so the public assumes it’s only the players like Bonds, Palmeiro, McGuire, Sosa, etc. that are to blame. Yet cycling kicks out anyone that doesn’t even report for a drug test, and everyone thinks the sport is corrupt. It doesn’t make sense and it’s really starting to piss me off.
That's my post-bar rant.
9 Comments:
DS:
1) Evidence rules.
2) You're right about baseball itself (and especially Bud Selig) ducking all the infamy while a handful of individuals get blamed for ruining the entire sport.
While not cycling-specific, America's Finest News Source has noticed similar disparities:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/barry_bonds_home_run_scandal
I disagree, Rasmussen should absolutely have been kicked off the tour and pro cycling altogether. Otherwise you have the leader and eventual winner under a heavy cloud of suspicion that only gets resolved AFTER he's won the race (see Landis)? Yes, he never tested positive, but only because he avoided being tested; that's a violation of the rules and a serious enough offense to be banned in my book. This isn't a court proceeding, there's no presumption of innocence, especially in France where the burden would be reversed.
A dark day in cycling, only hope is that by ridding itself of Rasmussen and other dopers, the tour can gain back its legitimacy.
As a former semi-pro cyclist who loves the lifestyle and the sport, I am still inclined to agree with 10:30. Cycling (and all that comes with along with it) is Rassmussen's job. Part of that job is mandatory drug testing. Personally, I have a very strong opinion about what the results of Rassmussen's test would have been had he shown up. Some people may be willing to give him the benefit of doubt, but what can't be doubted is that he failed to do his job as a professional cyclist, and then lied about it. At most other jobs (except maybe the US Attorney General these days) that is reason enough for dismissal.
Just for the reccord - Michael Rasmussen was testet twice within 45 days prior to the Tour de France by Danish Antidoping and UCI.....
Rasmussen was also tested several times during this year's Tour de France, and all the tests were negative for banned substances.
I don't think he should have been booted from the TDF. Other cyclists have missed tests, and they are still racing in the TDF. Rasmussen was singled out, and I don't agree with that.
Rasmussen's negative tests before and during the tour are irrelevant to the charges. He missed tests and lied to cover it up, that's a serious violation. Just because others might have broken the rules does not mean they shouldn't be enforced against him, especially as the tour leader. Remember, it wasn't the tour officials or the UCI which expelled him, but his own team which withdrew him under pressure from their corporate sponsor, Rabobank. It is a hopeful sign that sponsors are holding the teams to higher standards out of fear for their own reputation.
The guy who ended up champion of this years Tour de France is no cleaner than Rasmussen.
Rasmussen was robbed!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20044184/
*YAWN*
Post a Comment
<< Home