Wednesday, December 26, 2007
The Rules of Engagement
Senior Status:
Armen's ProfileTacitus' Profile
Tom's Profile
Disco Stu(d)'s Profile
Mad J.D.'s Profile
Max Power Profile
Isaac's Profile
Earl Warren's Profile
MRP's Profile
Sean Fernandes' Profile
Slam Master A's Profile
TJ's Profile
Caley's Profile
Carbolic's Profile
McWho's Profile
Patrick's Profile
Toney's Profile
J.D.elicious' Profile
Bekki's Profile
Dan's Profile
Petch’s Profile
Active Status:
Jackie O's ProfileJames' Profile
L'Alex's Profile
Maude's Profile
McTwo’s Profile
Ursus Major's Profile
Labeled Threads:
What is a Labeled Thread?0L/1L Advice
Academia
Bar Exams
BLF
Boalt Briefs
Classes and Professors
CLR Discussion
Clerkships
DE
Deep Space
DO
Elections
Exams
Grades
Grammar Snarks
Greetings from the BHSA
Honor Code
Idaho
Kashmiri
Law Student Life
Legal Culture
Legal Education Costs
Library
LRAP
Moot Court and Trial Team
Moving Out (Graduation)
N&B
Nancy Grace
OCIP and Employment
Only in Berkeley
Professor Quotes
Professor Ratings
Prop. 8
Rabid Conservatives
Rabid Liberals
Rankings
Shiny Gold Stars
Technology Rants
The Others
The Red Menace
The Resident Evil
The Simpsons
Yoo-Hoo
Blogroll
De NovoThe Tacitus Project
Group Think Tank
Berkeley/Boalt Blogs
Anderson BerryBeetle Beat
Berkeley Graduate
Berkeley Jurisprude
Berkeley Law Blog
Bleed Blue & Gold
Boalt Professor Review
Boalt H. Civ. P.
Boalt Movie Review
Cal Stuff
Cause and Defect
Dean Berring's Building Blog
Exact Approx
Expressio Unius
For God and For Cheese
Frolicking in Your Panda
A Girl Walks into a Bar (Exam)
Governing Through Crime
Jungle Cat Diaries
I'm Not Crunchy
La Mitotera
Musings from Boalt Hall
Robert Reich's Blog
The Present Tense
Repatriated Expatriate
The Seema Machine
Stacita
A Year Deferred
Other Blogs
Above the LawAmbivalent Imbroglio
Amicus Curae
The Armacost Project
Bag and Baggage (Boalt '90)
Bainbridge
Balkinization
Barely Legal
Begging to Differ
Biting Tongue
Black Book Legal
Blawg Wisdom
BlueGrassRoots
Boffo Blog
Buffalo Wings & Vodka
Color of Law
Concurring Opinions
The Debate Link
Dropping a Barbell
EB Express Blog
First Movers
The Frugal Law Student
Half the Sins of Mankind
Head Heeb
Hear Me Roar
Illiterally
Intel Dump
Inter Alia
Is That Legal?
JAG Central
JD2B
Jeremy Blachman
Kevin Drum
Law & Terrorism Blog
Law Career Blog
Legal Ethics
Legal Times Blog
Leiter's Law School Rep
Leiter Rep
Life of Lexi (UVA/Hutz fan)
Mel Woods
Memoirs of Hastings
Notes from the (1L) Underground
Notes from the (Legal) Underground
Objective Justice
Orin Kerr
Other Side of Wall (Hastings)
Prague Blog
Random...Chase
Samples Connection
SCOTUSBlog
The Berkeley Blog
The Shark
SoapBox Law
Sua Sponte
Sua Sponte (GW Law)
Sui Generis
Three Years of Hell
TJ's Double Play
Trad'l Notions (USF)
Turning Cathy into a Lawyer
Underneath Their Robes
Volokh Conspiracy
Will Work for Favorable Dicta
6 Comments:
That's not to say other Blawgs don't write posts about the ads that appear on their site.
I personally approve, and know that many classmates wouldn't even notice a difference. However, there will always be one or two ideologically opposed who will be sure to let you hear about it. I guess the real question is whether you think it'll really detract from the purpose of the site or steer readers elsewhere - probably neither being the case...
I think it's a good move. People bitching about the "sellout" will spike your traffic.
Here's a question about Google advertising, only sort of related to Armen's temptation: If I were to forward a privileged work email to my personal gmail account (e.g. because it might be more convenient to work on it at home that way), knowing that Google's computers "read" the content of my emails in order to put context-sensitive ads on my screen, have I waived the privilege? My instinct is that the answer should be no. But what if Google technicians and programmers sometimes also read the emails as part of the process of fine-tuning the "reading" software? I suppose it makes a difference whether or not I know that to be the case, right? For the time being, I plan to avoid this practice. What do you think?
That. Is. A. FASCINATING. Question. Not being qualified to answer, I lurk with interest.
Here's a much less interesting potential problem for lawyers using gmail. (Not that I ever read that OTHER legal ethics blog.)
On the subject of Armen's original post, I don't see any problem with it, other than a slight aesthetic preference on my part for ad-free blog reading.
Some commenters (virtually always anonymous) have occasionally expressed the (incorrect, weak-minded) opinion that the blog is somehow the property of the school community. This has usually cropped up when Armen has exercised his power to delete inappropriate comments, etc. If there were ads, I think Armen's control/ownership of the blog would be more obvious, and we would be less likely to hear those comments.
Post a Comment
<< Home