Sunday, July 13, 2008

Building a Better Legal Profession

Like the author of the post below this one I also share a letter, this time from Building a Better Legal Profession.  BBLP is an organization that was created last fall by Stanford students (referenced here on N&B) and is itching to grow.  The letter is self-explanatory, and I think you'll find its message germane to the looming OCIP season.

Or, germane at least to a discussion about methods by which to choose a law firm, aside from the good old fashioned NALP-sheet-salary-troll.
----------------

Dear Students, Colleagues, Friends of Boalt:

Another season of on-campus interviews is fast approaching, and law students across the country will soon be scratching their heads, wondering how to differentiate between law firms. Building a Better Legal Profession was launched by two law students last fall in an effort to create greater transparency in the profession and to change the way students approach interview season. The more students talk about choices and balance, the more firms respond. We're hoping that this year, you'll join in the call for reform by starting a chapter at your school. With a new website set to launch, a fall OCI campus tour in the works, and a new round of rankings, we're poised to up the ante this year--but we need your help. (You can check out some of the press BBLP got this year here: The Lawyers Weekly, Law.com, Daily News, The Shark, The Chicago Tribune, JD Bliss, Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, [and *cough* Nuts & Boalts].)

The race to $160K means cash on hand for young lawyers, but what's the catch? We can probably expect more billable hours, less balance, fewer opportunities for pro bono work, and greater dissatisfaction. The resulting mass exodus from firms is not just bad for recent law grads, it's bad for the profession. By starting a BBLP chapter at your school, you can bring real choices to your colleagues. For every friend and colleage at your school who chooses job satisfaction over the highest salary, firms will have another reason to shift their focus.

Law students are in high demand, and we can afford to be more selective in our career choices. Building a Better Legal Profession seeks to harness the market power of law students to encourage reform at large private law firms. As a national grassroots organization, BBLP is only as strong as its student network.

This is where you come in.

We hope you'll join with us by starting a BBLP chapter at your school this fall. With your help, your colleagues can walk into interviews with a better understanding of their market power. Instead of being auctioned off to the highest bidder, they can join a generation of associates who are swapping dollars for time, balance, and community. Empower your friends by shedding some light on the import of their career choices, and they will thank you.

Spearhead a BBLP chapter, and we'll send you all the materials you need to spread the word. Please let us know if you would like to get involved as a chapter director. Or if there's someone who you think might be interested, we'd appreciate your passing this message along.

I look forward to connecting with you soon!

Best Regards,
[The Folks at Better Legal Profession]

www.betterlegalprofession.org
BBLP on Facebook


Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The race to $160K means cash on hand for young lawyers, but what's the catch? We can probably expect more billable hours, less balance, fewer opportunities for pro bono work, and greater dissatisfaction."

Uhhh...yeah. You don't get paid $160K+ so that you're a happy little camper. Give me a break. Boalties, resist the urge to form one of this little whiny chapters. Do you want employers to continue hiring all-P Boalties or not? Don't give them a reason to look elsewhere... If you don't want a crap quality of life, don't work for a large law firm. Sadly, no, you cannot have it all.

7/13/2008 12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Did you look at their methodology? It's laughable. They basically just look to see the percentage of partners/associates from underrepresented demographic groups at each firm and give them a score based on that. It doesn't control for any third variables.

http://stanford.edu/~bruck/explanation/How.pdf

7/13/2008 12:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks like Oscar the Grouch is preparing for OCIP. Oscar (12:00), I think your grouchy little message is unnecessary. Boalt graduates--even those with all Ps--should keep their happiness and values in mind, even if they are destined for big law. Being thoughtful and discriminating is not equal to being naive. In fact, I'd argue that it's more prudent to consider these things now instead of a few years down the road, especially b/c of the unpleasant stats re. lawyers' mental health.

7/13/2008 12:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you care about billable hour requirements, ask:
1) What is the minimum requirement?
2) How many hours does the average associate bill?

If they tell you straight up, you know what you need to know. If they flounder around or act shifty, you know you probably don't want to work there. If they think it's an inappropriate question and don't hire you because of it, you wouldn't have been happy there anyways.

7/14/2008 8:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Exploring-Career-Options/Building-a-Better-Legal-Profession/
Does this provide some of the complementary nuance it sounds like you all want?

7/14/2008 10:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home