Wednesday, October 22, 2008
The Rules of Engagement
Senior Status:
Armen's ProfileTacitus' Profile
Tom's Profile
Disco Stu(d)'s Profile
Mad J.D.'s Profile
Max Power Profile
Isaac's Profile
Earl Warren's Profile
MRP's Profile
Sean Fernandes' Profile
Slam Master A's Profile
TJ's Profile
Caley's Profile
Carbolic's Profile
McWho's Profile
Patrick's Profile
Toney's Profile
J.D.elicious' Profile
Bekki's Profile
Dan's Profile
Petch’s Profile
Active Status:
Jackie O's ProfileJames' Profile
L'Alex's Profile
Maude's Profile
McTwo’s Profile
Ursus Major's Profile
Labeled Threads:
What is a Labeled Thread?0L/1L Advice
Academia
Bar Exams
BLF
Boalt Briefs
Classes and Professors
CLR Discussion
Clerkships
DE
Deep Space
DO
Elections
Exams
Grades
Grammar Snarks
Greetings from the BHSA
Honor Code
Idaho
Kashmiri
Law Student Life
Legal Culture
Legal Education Costs
Library
LRAP
Moot Court and Trial Team
Moving Out (Graduation)
N&B
Nancy Grace
OCIP and Employment
Only in Berkeley
Professor Quotes
Professor Ratings
Prop. 8
Rabid Conservatives
Rabid Liberals
Rankings
Shiny Gold Stars
Technology Rants
The Others
The Red Menace
The Resident Evil
The Simpsons
Yoo-Hoo
Blogroll
De NovoThe Tacitus Project
Group Think Tank
Berkeley/Boalt Blogs
Anderson BerryBeetle Beat
Berkeley Graduate
Berkeley Jurisprude
Berkeley Law Blog
Bleed Blue & Gold
Boalt Professor Review
Boalt H. Civ. P.
Boalt Movie Review
Cal Stuff
Cause and Defect
Dean Berring's Building Blog
Exact Approx
Expressio Unius
For God and For Cheese
Frolicking in Your Panda
A Girl Walks into a Bar (Exam)
Governing Through Crime
Jungle Cat Diaries
I'm Not Crunchy
La Mitotera
Musings from Boalt Hall
Robert Reich's Blog
The Present Tense
Repatriated Expatriate
The Seema Machine
Stacita
A Year Deferred
Other Blogs
Above the LawAmbivalent Imbroglio
Amicus Curae
The Armacost Project
Bag and Baggage (Boalt '90)
Bainbridge
Balkinization
Barely Legal
Begging to Differ
Biting Tongue
Black Book Legal
Blawg Wisdom
BlueGrassRoots
Boffo Blog
Buffalo Wings & Vodka
Color of Law
Concurring Opinions
The Debate Link
Dropping a Barbell
EB Express Blog
First Movers
The Frugal Law Student
Half the Sins of Mankind
Head Heeb
Hear Me Roar
Illiterally
Intel Dump
Inter Alia
Is That Legal?
JAG Central
JD2B
Jeremy Blachman
Kevin Drum
Law & Terrorism Blog
Law Career Blog
Legal Ethics
Legal Times Blog
Leiter's Law School Rep
Leiter Rep
Life of Lexi (UVA/Hutz fan)
Mel Woods
Memoirs of Hastings
Notes from the (1L) Underground
Notes from the (Legal) Underground
Objective Justice
Orin Kerr
Other Side of Wall (Hastings)
Prague Blog
Random...Chase
Samples Connection
SCOTUSBlog
The Berkeley Blog
The Shark
SoapBox Law
Sua Sponte
Sua Sponte (GW Law)
Sui Generis
Three Years of Hell
TJ's Double Play
Trad'l Notions (USF)
Turning Cathy into a Lawyer
Underneath Their Robes
Volokh Conspiracy
Will Work for Favorable Dicta
5 Comments:
Speaking of utterly obvious contradictions, did anyone see this one.
Basically, Palin says in one breath that she's "not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do."
But she was proud to "vote[] along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend [the Alaska] Constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman." In her own words, "I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support gay marriage."
Doesn't telling homosexuals they can't get married constitute "telling [individuals] what they can and can't do, should and should not do"?!? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here!
I think the flip-flopping is a little scarier on the Obama side. It's one thing to change positions. It's an entire other thing to think the people around you are so stupid that you can re-write history and expect nobody to call you out on it.
It may be produced by the McCain team, but it's hard for Obama fan-boys to refute.
I'll probably still vote Obama though...
@9:19--yeah, but McCain is still clinging to the dream that the surge solved all the problems, when senior military officials have stated, albeit vaguely, that the situational improvements in the past year are attributable to a top secret change in tactics rather than the surge.
P.S. Eat me.
2:27 refutes nothing, implicitly agreeing with 9:19. And then asks her to "eat" him.
That's some quality reasons to base a vote decision upon.
One thing I don't understand is how McCain can accuse Obama of failing to admit that the surge worked, when McCain hasn't ever admitted that invading Iraq in the first place was a mistake.
Even more surprising is that no one has brought this up, and if they have, no one has run with it.
I mean, it was the war that BROUGHT al qaeda to Iraq, and brought on the sectarian violence, right? How many Americans would have died if we hadn't gone there? Oh well; hopefully this will all be behind us soon enough.
Post a Comment
<< Home