Everyone's a Winner*
Over the weekend the New York Times ran an article about lawyers and online social media like Facebook and Twitter. The article explains something that should be obvious: trial lawyers who blog or tweet about their judge are asking for trouble, as is the attorney whose facebook page suggests a week of partying, after the judge granted a continuance for a death in the attorney's family. (Seriously. That happened. And now the guy is all over the New York Times.)
The article implied,correctly, that judges play a substantial role in regulating attorney conduct. It reminded me of three questions from a Wall Street Journal Law Blog post two years ago -- questions law school hasn't answered for me:
*Click the title of this post for an explanation.
The article implied,correctly, that judges play a substantial role in regulating attorney conduct. It reminded me of three questions from a Wall Street Journal Law Blog post two years ago -- questions law school hasn't answered for me:
- Why is a legal malpractice case so much harder to make out than a medical malpractice case?
- Why is the attorney-client privilege the oldest and most jealously protected of all the professional privileges?
- Why are lawyers the only American profession to be truly and completely self-regulated?
*Click the title of this post for an explanation.
Labels: Legal Culture
2 Comments:
There will be a big conference at Berkeley on October 23rd, titled:
Social Networks: Friends or Foes? Confronting Online Legal and Ethical Issues in an Age of Social Networking.
zealously protected?
Post a Comment
<< Home